WordPress Concrete5 Comparison
WordPress and Concrete 5 are both Hypertext Pre-Processor (PHP) based content management systems. Each offers the flexibility and usability of PHP language for a full and robust content platform. The popularity of the two systems makes their use both easy and manageable. In order to provide a full WordPress Concrete5 comparison, let’s first examine the differences.
WordPress is by far the more popular, and thus more widely used, of the two platforms. This provides users with a wealth of resources, examples, and available experts to assist in building content with WordPress.
There are an almost unlimited number of downloads, plugins, and add-ons available for WordPress for developers and users to enhance their sites. This helps a new user quickly develop their site, enhance their SEO placement, and shorten the time from the conception of the idea to a live fully functional site. It also provides a solid basis for experienced PHP developers to expedite bringing sites online.
SEO optimization is critical to the success of any site. The most popular search engines Google™, Yahoo™, and Bing™ show a preference for WordPress based sites.
Concrete5 offers a powerful suite of tools. Since these tools are developed and managed by Concrete5 the provide absolute compatibility with the Concrete5 environment. The benefit is the portability of the plug-ins and add-ons for a Concrete5 based site, the downside is the limitation of availability from a single source.
SEO optimization is robust and effective. However, the preference of the major search engines for WordPress puts Concrete5 at a distinct disadvantage. However, Concrete5 is growing in market share and offers a strong alternative to WordPress.
Listen to the Latest Episodes Right Now.
Concrete5 users tend to be more experienced and look for alternatives to WordPress, either as a way to differentiate their site from the crowd or to explore the functionality of a WordPress alternative. A recent innovation in the Concrete5 platform that adds even more differentiation from WordPress is a drag and drop feature.
While this new functionality is in the early stages of use, and the reviews have been mixed to this point, like any other innovation it offers great potential as the system matures.
WordPress and Concrete5 Similarities
Both platforms use the powerful, yet easy to learn, PHP development platform. This reduces the learning curve for users to gain experience with these systems. Users who understand the PHP platform can adapt to either of the two systems as they develop and optimize their sites.
Both systems offer strong management capability. From controlling development and changes, to deployment, each offer a powerful control environment. There are no significant differences in the management capabilities of each platform.
Anyone looking to deploy a site needs to seriously way the security of their chosen platform. A comparison of the security of WordPress and Concrete5 shows very little difference.
Both offer strong internal and external security controls. Any properly experience developer recognizes that security risks are inherent in any web deployment. Selecting the platform for site development must include a full consideration of security.
Both these systems provide robust and adaptable security protocols and controls. There is no clear advantage to either system. The single most important determination of a properly secured site is dependent on the experience of the user and the time invested in taking advantage of each systems security architecture.
In any WordPress Concrete5 comparison the most significant difference is in the popularity of each system. Here, WordPress holds a distinct advantage.
WordPress clearly has more exposure, more users, a wider distribution, and a higher number of deployed sites than Concrete5. Some of this popularity may arise from the fact that WordPress has been available longer.
One consideration in choosing a PHP platform is the level of experience of the users. There are clear differences in the user level of these respective systems. As was pointed out in the section describing the differences offered by Concrete5 over WordPress, the typical user of Concrete5 tends to be more experienced.
Along with experience comes the ability to recognize weaknesses in a system that may not have been apparent as the user spent time with the system. Users are looking for alternatives to the WordPress environment as a way to set themselves apart from the crowd.
This migration to Concrete5 by previous WordPress users may signal a recognition of sufficient differences between the platforms to discard some of the advantages of WordPress (SEO, search engine preferences, see above) in order to take advantage of Concrete5 functionality differences.
Our WordPress Concrete5 comparison has identified several points to consider if you are selecting PHP based content management system.
Both WordPress and Concrete5 offer a robust development environment. They both offer excellent security and manageability. In terms of popularity, while WordPress is clearly more popular generally, Concrete5 is attracting more experienced users looking for an edge.
WordPress has a clear advantage in the availability of downloadable add-ons and plugins available from a wide variety of sources. Concrete5 offers similar functionality but all of these are distributed by Concrete5.
Search engines prefer sites built on WordPress but this is a constantly developing factor. While important, it is always subject to change. WordPress is clearly the leader as of today. For the new user, WordPress is likely the safest bet, but as one gains experience Concrete 5 may be worth considering.