WordPress Plone Comparison
With the entire world going digital it is a good idea to know your options when it comes to content management. There is myriad of choices that provide options for images, documents, videos, multimedia and other digital content. Checking two popular options, a WordPress / Plone comparison will show the benefits and troubles with each. Keeping in mind that content management administrators will go with what they are most comfortable with, this comparison will try to be non-judgmental for both services.
Plone is a one-click installer after download, integrating all the tools and features that are required for an administrator to setup the content management system for a client. WordPress content management software is an add-in to the WordPress backbone, and also easily installed.
The difference in installation comes when looking at full functionality. Plone is complete out of the gate but WordPress requires more add-ins for different features that are not included in the CMS add-in. However, in reverence to WordPress, it is very easy to find the add-in download for CMS. Installation after download is also very easy for an administrator.
There seems to be some disagreements in those who read WordPress / Plone comparisons regarding which is an easier installation. Discussion is based on what makes for a seamless install, and whether client configuration, additional functionality needs, and completeness of installation.
Plone can be installed, setup, and left to run on its own with little management required on the part of an administrator. Unless new changes or additions/subtractions to what content is to be managed, Plone will not need a lot of overseeing by a systems administrator.
Listen to the Latest Episodes Right Now.
Deployment of Plone is also easy to perform. Features, functions and coding can be created in a single file within the Plone software. This includes any add-ins that would add extras as well as skins to customize the user interface. WordPress deployment of like build-outs is less streamlined and can be complicated to determine.
Searchable documentation is a priority. If you have content on a server you want to be able to find it when you need it. Plone has better interface between the client and the server, allowing for ease of location for documents or other content. WordPress has a feature that allows for the same ease of locating content but it is not native to the software and requires an add-on. Plone also offers a full-text search which is not available in the WordPress CMS add-ins.
System management seems to be easier within the Plone platform as well. The streamlined base of Plone offers simple methods for an administrator to manage, change, update, or improve the client’s experience.
Plone may take more time to install and configure from start to finish, based on client needs, expectations, and requirements. Keep in mind that Plone is directed toward larger content management requirements like those required for banks, hospitals, major corporations and federal agencies. Even though the installation and subsequent build-out to customize the appearance and requirements of the client, it becomes a robust and reliable system.
WordPress is easier to install but then if one is deploying the content management for a business it is important to recall how it was done. Without a lot of extra documentation to indicate each selection, which add-in, which features are hidden, and how the client view looks, it becomes a more cumbersome process.
Plone has been created with fewer add-in requirements out of the initial installation. There are many individuals who would swear by Plone over WordPress, but there are also those who are adamant that WordPress is the content management service that is better. The reality is that this is opinion based upon familiarity and personal preference.
WordPress and Plone both offer themes that are specific to client needs. Depending on the familiarity to either WordPress or Plone, the client may have a specific preference. If the client is a large scale corporation, banking institutions, medical facilities, or a government entity, it may be more important to look at vulnerabilities over preference.
Security of Data
Nothing is more important to a client than having their data secure. Whether it is a proprietary bit of programming or the next great novel, the client expects that their data will be safe from hackers or other data thieves. Plone has proven to provide better protection by a large margin. WordPress, likely due to its original BLOG presence, is not as security conscious.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation uses Plone for its content management. That is not to say WordPress is not a good option, even though there are many more vulnerabilities, hackers are not seemingly using those vulnerabilities, so content is relatively secure.
There are many reasons that one may consider this WordPress / Plone comparison. You may not know anything about either of these two services, you may be biased to one or the other of the applications, or you may be investigating to find out if anything has changed from either of these two content management services.
You can find functionality, ease of install, and security with both of the services. Although Plone has a great deal less vulnerabilities; it seems that WordPress is not suffering from their many vulnerabilities. As with almost anything in life, the personal preference of the administrator, needs of the client, and familiarity are all important when deciding whether to use WordPress or Plone for your digital content management needs.